Final Thoughts This is a phenomenal lens, but ultimately, I won't be buying it. Why? While this lens is amazing in both its perspective and image quality, I don't feel like I can trust the AF during the demanding conditions of weddings, as the lens is both slow to acquire focus, and inconsistent in low light. Also, in order to really get the bokeh and subject isolation that this lens can produce, I found you have to be quite close to your subject. I am very close to the subjects in this post (a few inches away in most cases), which results in good bokeh, but there's not always that opportunity during weddings.
As someone who favors telephoto, I found it quite difficult to pre-visualize and compose shots with a wide angle prime. Maybe in the future, this may change, but right now, I'll stick to my telephoto lenses :)
The price tag of this lens, at $2100, also makes it the most expensive of Nikon's current primes, and I don't think I'll use it enough to merit buying it.
It's not that this lens isn't great (it's freaking amazing), it's just not the best fit for my needs as a photographer.
Thanks for reading, and feel free to comment below if you have any questions :) |
Your Reviews .... like a friend arriving at night to the campfire, are always welcome!
ReplyDeleteI've had the same great service from Hawaii Photo Rental also. Is the reason why AF (vs other lenses mentioned) was slow because you shot @ 1.4 vs. 2.8?
-Steve
Thanks Steve! Nah, if anything, a larger aperture would allow for more light to enter the camera, resulting in faster AF. I think it's just the AF-S motor in the 24G.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your post. I have been going back and for on the 24 1.4 or the 35 1.4. I am leaning towards the 35 more now.
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome! Glad I could help out. I've been using the 35mm 1.4G for several months now, and I gotta say...it's a phenomenal lens. Here's a review that I did on it...enjoy!
ReplyDeletehttp://fleetingcaptures.blogspot.com/2012/12/nikon-35mm-14g-review.html