The 85mm focal length has always been my favorite for portrait work...it provides the perfect working distance between the subject and I, at least for my tastes. About a year ago, I bought the Nikon 85mm 1.4D lens. I absolutely loved the lens, and was blown away at how elegantly it melted the backgrounds away in my images. The lens was a champ in good light, showing crazy sharpness wide open at 1.4, but started to show noticeable weaknesses in low light and contrasty light. I found out that the lens (at least my copy), struggled in indoor and night settings, which was when I needed it the most for my wedding work. I'd get a lot of misses on the AF, and couldn't rely on it 100%. In addition, I found out the lens couldn't handle strongly backlit subjects at all. The AF would fail to lock on, and would just zip through its focus range without achieving focus. As much as I loved the lens (it rendered the best skin tones I've ever seen in a Nikon lens), I finally sold it due to the AF.
There were two candidates to fill the space in my lineup: The Nikon 85mm 1.4G lens, and the Sigma 85mm 1.4 lens. The Nikon had been nearly impossible to find, and most places were selling it for $2K+ because it was in such limited supply, but high demand. I had been eyeing the Sigma 85mm 1.4 when it came out about a year and a half ago, and decided to look into the lens more. I went online, reading a ton of lens reviews, from top wedding and portrait shooters. They had a lot of good things to say about the Sigma, and it significantly raised my interest in the lens. I finally decided to bit the bullet and bought the Sigma. All I can say is I'm glad I did. |
that's a big step for you to go 3rd party. the bokeh is awesome! next you should get the sigma 30 1.4. that's a solid lens my brother-in-law and i borrowed for a costume shoot of our kids. was a really nice lens.
ReplyDeleteThe Siggy 30mm 1.4 is on my list, although I do wish Nikon made a similar one for crop sensors :)
ReplyDeletegreat review and some great photos you've taken with the lens. good thing you mentioned that the AF performance is better than Nikon's own 85mm f/1.4, certainly looks that way. the focus on the kids running were nicely done. great great job! :)
ReplyDeleteIhsan
Thanks Ihsan! let me know if you have any other questions about the lens!
ReplyDeleteBecause of your recent posts I did some research of my own and can concur, the Sigma is the better overall (except for re-sell value) 85mm/f1.4.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing Reese!
downingsf
Hi Reese,
ReplyDeleteVery nice review with nice sample pics. I am using a D7000. I mainly will be doing weddings, and want a fast lens. I would like the 70-200 VR II, but it is too pricy, so I may consider a Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS, though, I prefer to have a better F value like 1.4 or 1.8. Now as I have not seen this on any lens so far, I was thinking of the Sigma 85mm 1.4 as a mid-tele at 127.5mm, and use my feet and creativity. I know the Sigma 85mm is a prime, and so no VR / OS, but will it really be needed which such a fast lens?
Thanks! :) this is one of the better reviews i have seen. and i t makes my want to look a bit closer at the sigmas version of the 85mm. thank yo again :)
ReplyDeleteThank you for the review. Some photos are not showing, could you please update them?
ReplyDeleteI just checked the posting info for this post...everything looks okay. Maybe you need to refresh your browser?
ReplyDelete